The Influence of Total Quality Management (TQM) on Quality Cost Efficiency and Managerial Performance and the Implications for Company Performance
Abstract
The study aimed to determine the effect of Total Quality Management (TQM) on quality cost efficiency and managerial performance and its implications on company performance. In the research, the researchers involved 100 companies in Indonesia. The analysis used is a structural approach to the Equation Model (SEM) assisted by the Smart PLS application. The results showed that there was a significant positive effect between total quality management, quality cost efficiency, managerial performance, and total management quality on company performance mediated by managerial performance. The amount of the r square of the company’s performance variable is explained by the total quality management, quality cost efficiency, and managerial performance of 88.9%.
References
Abbas, J. (2020). Impact of total quality management on corporate sustainability through the mediating effect of knowledge management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118806. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.118806
Abubakar, A. M., Elrehail, H., Alatailat, M. A., & Elçi, A. (2019). Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(2), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JIK.2017.07.003
Al-Dhaafri, H. S., Al-Swidi, A. K., & Yusoff, R. Z. Bin. (2016). The mediating role of total quality management between the entrepreneurial orientation and the organizational performance. TQM Journal, 28(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-03-2014-0033/FULL/PDF
Albuhisi, A. M., & Abdallah, A. B. (2018). The impact of soft TQM on financial performance: The mediating roles of non-financial balanced scorecard perspectives. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 35(7), 1360–1379. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2017-0036/FULL/XML
Almatrooshi, B., Singh, S. K., & Farouk, S. (2016). Determinants of organizational performance: a proposed framework. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(6), 844–859. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-02-2016-0038/FULL/PDF
Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., Vasarhelyi, M., & Yan, Z. (2017). Impact of business analytics and enterprise systems on managerial accounting. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2017.03.003
Aquilani, B., Silvestri, C., Ruggieri, A., & Gatti, C. (2017). A systematic literature review on total quality management critical success factors and the identification of new avenues of research. TQM Journal, 29(1), 184–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-01-2016-0003/FULL/XML
Bakotić, D., & Rogošić, A. (2015). Employee involvement as a key determinant of core quality management practices. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/14783363.2015.1094369, 28(11–12), 1209–1226. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2015.1094369
Bolatan, G. I. S., Gozlu, S., Alpkan, L., & Zaim, S. (2016). The Impact of Technology Transfer Performance on Total Quality Management and Quality Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 746–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2016.11.076
Chams, N., García-Blandón, J., & Hassan, K. (2021). Role Reversal! Financial Performance as an Antecedent of ESG: The Moderating Effect of Total Quality Management. Sustainability 2021, Vol. 13, Page 7026, 13(13), 7026. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13137026
Dahlgaard-Park, S. M., Reyes, L., & Chen, C. K. (2018). The evolution and convergence of total quality management and management theories. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1486556, 29(9–10), 1108–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1486556
Dahlgaard, J. J., Reyes, L., Chen, C. K., & Dahlgaard-Park, S. M. (2019). Evolution and future of total quality management: management control and organisational learning. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/14783363.2019.1665776, 30(sup1), S1–S16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2019.1665776
Donate, M. J., Ruiz-Monterrubio, E., Sánchez de Pablo, J. D., & Peña, I. (2020). Total quality management and high-performance work systems for social capital development: Effects on company innovation capabilities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-07-2018-0116/FULL/XML
Ertuğrul Köse, & Hüner Şencan. (2016). The Effect of Decision Making Competence on Managerial Performance . International Journal of Commerce and Finance, 2(2).
Gerner, M. (2019). Assessing and managing sustainability in international perspective: corporate sustainability across cultures – towards a strategic framework implementation approach. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility 2019 4:1, 4(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40991-019-0043-X
Gerrish, E. (2016). The Impact of Performance Management on Performance in Public Organizations: A Meta-Analysis. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/PUAR.12433
Ghani Al-Saffar, N. A., & Obeidat, A. M. (2020). The effect of total quality management practices on employee performance: The moderating role of knowledge sharing. Management Science Letters. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.8.014
Hernandez-Espallardo, M., Osorio-Tinoco, F., & Rodriguez-Orejuela, A. (2018). Improving firm performance through inter-organizational collaborative innovations: The key mediating role of the employee’s job-related attitudes. Management Decision, 56(6), 1167–1182. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2017-0151/FULL/PDF
Holota, T., Hrubec, J., Kotus, M., Holienčinová, M., & Čapošov, E. (2016). The management of quality costs analysis model. Serbian Journal of Management, 11(1), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.5937/SJM11-9347
Jalilvand, M. R., Khazaei Pool, J., Balouei Jamkhaneh, H., & Tabaeeian, R. A. (2018). Total quality management, corporate social responsibility and entrepreneurial orientation in the hotel industry. Social Responsibility Journal, 14(3), 601–618. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2017-0068/FULL/PDF
Jimoh, R., Oyewobi, L., Isa, R., & Waziri, I. (2018). Total quality management practices and organizational performance: the mediating roles of strategies for continuous improvement. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/15623599.2017.1411456, 19(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2017.1411456
Kaur, M., Singh, K., & Singh, D. (2019). Synergetic success factors of total quality management (TQM) and supply chain management (SCM): A literature review. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 36(6), 842–863. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-11-2017-0228/FULL/XML
Kolding, M., Sundblad, M., Alexa, J., Stone, M., Aravopoulou, E., & Evans, G. (2018). Information management – a skills gap? Bottom Line, 31(3–4), 170–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-09-2018-0037/FULL/XML
Leu, J. Der, & Lee, L. J. H. (2016). Enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation using the value engineering methodology and Six Sigma tools. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/17517575.2016.1215537, 11(8), 1243–1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2016.1215537
Lindström, J., Lejon, E., Kyösti, P., Mecella, M., Heutelbeck, D., Hemmje, M., … Gunnarsson, B. (2019). Towards intelligent and sustainable production systems with a zero-defect manufacturing approach in an Industry4.0 context. Procedia CIRP, 81, 880–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCIR.2019.03.218
Malik, T. M., Khalid, R., Zulqarnain, A., & Iqbal, S. A. (2016). Cost of quality: Findings of a wood products’manufacturer. TQM Journal, 28(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-01-2014-0014/FULL/PDF
Manova, K., & Yu, Z. (2017). Multi-product firms and product quality. Journal of International Economics, 109, 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JINTECO.2017.08.006
Mehralian, G., Nazari, J. A., Nooriparto, G., & Rasekh, H. R. (2017). TQM and organizational performance using the balanced scorecard approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 66(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2015-0114/FULL/PDF
Mokhtar, N., Jusoh, R., & Zulkifli, N. (2016). Corporate characteristics and environmental management accounting (EMA) implementation: evidence from Malaysian public listed companies (PLCs). Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.01.085
Muhammad Haroon Hafeez, Muhammad Farhan Basheer, Majid Rafique, & Sulaman Hafeez Siddiqui. (2018). Exploring the Links between TQM Practices, Business Innovativeness and Firm Performance: An Emerging Market Perspective. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 38(2), 485–500.
Neyestani, B. (2017). Principles and Contributions of Total Quality Mangement (TQM) Gurus on Business Quality Improvement. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2950981
Nguyen, T. L. H., & Nagase, K. (2019). The influence of total quality management on customer satisfaction. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/20479700.2019.1647378, 12(4), 277–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2019.1647378
Pambreni, Y., Khatibi, A., Ferdous Azam, S. M., & Tham, J. (2019). The influence of total quality management toward organization performance. Management Science Letters. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.5.011
Pellegrino, R., Costantino, N., & Tauro, D. (2020). The role of risk management in buyer-supplier relationships with a preferred customer status for total quality management. TQM Journal, 32(5), 959–981. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-04-2019-0107/FULL/XML
Psomas, E. L., & Jaca, C. (2016). The impact of total quality management on service company performance: evidence from Spain. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 33(3), 380–398. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-07-2014-0090/FULL/PDF
Randhawa, J. S., & Ahuja, I. S. (2017). 5S – a quality improvement tool for sustainable performance: literature review and directions. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 34(3), 334–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2015-0045/FULL/XML
Sader, S., Husti, I., & Daróczi, M. (2019). Industry 4.0 as a Key Enabler toward Successful Implementation of Total Quality Management Practices. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 27(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPSO.12675
Saha, N., Gregar, A., & Sáha, P. (2017). Organizational agility and HRM strategy: Do they really enhance firms’ competitiveness? International Journal of Organizational Leadership. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2017.60454
Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2017). Managing and Measuring the Business Case for Sustainability : Capturing the Relationship between Sustainability Performance, Business Competitiveness and Economic Performance. Managing the Business Case for Sustainability, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351280525-1
Shadi Abualoush, Ra’ed Masa’deh, Khaled Bataineh, & Ala’aldin Alrowwad. (2018). The role of knowledge management process and intellectual capital as intermediary variables between knowledge management infrastructure and organization performance. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 13, 279–309.
Shafiq, M., Lasrado, F., & Hafeez, K. (2017). The effect of TQM on organisational performance: empirical evidence from the textile sector of a developing country using SEM. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1283211, 30(1–2), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1283211
Shin, D. H. (2017). Conceptualizing and measuring quality of experience of the internet of things: Exploring how quality is perceived by users. Information & Management, 54(8), 998–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IM.2017.02.006
Shin, D., & Konrad, A. M. (2014). Causality Between High-Performance Work Systems and Organizational Performance: Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0149206314544746, 43(4), 973–997. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314544746
Tseng, S. M. (2016). Knowledge management capability, customer relationship management, and service quality. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29(2), 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2014-0042/FULL/PDF
Vysochynska, O. (2017). Total cost of poor quality.
Welford, R. (2016). Corporate environmental management 3: Towards sustainable development. Corporate Environmental Management 3: Towards Sustainable Development, 3, 1–184. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315825106
Whitley, R. (2019). On the Nature of Managerial Tasks and Skills: Their Distinguishing Characteristics and Organization. Managerial Work, 337–352. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429398599-21
Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.2224
Yannis, P., & Nikolaos, B. (2018). Quantitative and Qualitative Research in Business Technology: Justifying a Suitable Research Methodology. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research.
Yokokawa, H., & Mizoguchi, M. (2016). Collaboration structure for the resurrection of Iitate Village, Fukushima: A case study of a nonprofitable organization. In Agricultural Implications of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident: The First Three Years. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55828-6_16
Zabri, S. M., Ahmad, K., & Wah, K. K. (2016). Corporate Governance Practices and Firm Performance: Evidence from Top 100 Public Listed Companies in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00036-8
Copyright (c) 2022 Elvina Elvina, Silvia Anggraeni, Sonnya Nurman Sasongko, Amanda Yunne Erlandian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
