Hidup dalam Stigma: Kekerasan dan Religiuitas Bejingan

  • Asma Wati Universitas Brawijaya Malang, Indonesia
  • Sholih Muadi Universitas Brawijaya Malang, Indonesia
  • George Towar Ikbal Tawakkal Universitas Brawijaya Malang, Indonesia
Keywords: Bejingan, Religion, Violence

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out that violence and religiosity can actually run side by side where both are able to make the figure of Bejingan have a different social strata from other communities. Violence is a characteristic of Bejingan in resolving conflicts in society while religiosity as a culture that has become ingrained in the community. To provide an understanding of the life of Bejingan in the community, this article explores how Bejingan lives in a standard of violence that has become a distinctive feature and cultural religiosity adopted in the community of Pamekasan Madura Regency. the method used in this study is qualitative with a case study approach where the researcher reveals in depth related to the life of Bejingan in Pamekasan Regency. The results obtained from this research are that Bejingan has long lived in stikma where its existence is always associated with violence and crime, whereas furthermore the role of Bejingan in the sphere of society has many benefits and benefits where security, conflict between citizens and the welfare of the community are influenced by the figure of Bejingan. Furthermore, the Bejong lives in a balanced balance of religiosity and violence where life is influenced by good relations between gods by practicing worship while still maintaining self-esteem in the distinctive characteristics of the heroism possessed. The scientific contribution of this article discusses the extension of the lives of local figures who have conflicting but side-by-side characteristics. Considering that the phenomenon that describes Bejingan is a conflict between culture and religion, then how can the conflict be balanced and go hand in hand. Then further research needs to be done.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A Latief. Madura yang Patuh? Kajian Antropologi Mengenai Budaya Madura. Jakarta: Ceric Fisip UI, 2003.

Abdur, Rozaki. Menabur Kharisma Menuai Kuasa : Kiprah Kyai dan Blater Sebagai Rezim Kembar di Madura. Yogjakarta: Pustaka Marwa, 2004.

Abdussalam, Ishaq. “Reproduksi Kekuasaan Kyai Dan Blater Di Kabupaten Bangkalan.” DIMENSI-Journal of Sociology 8, no. 1 (2015).

Ainilah, S. R. “Elite Politik Dalam Kontenstasi Di Desa Dengan Menggunakan Studi Peran Blater Dalam Pilkades Di Desa Banjar, Galis, Bangkalan Madura.” Jurnal Politik Muda.[internet][diunduh pada 2018 Desember4] 5, no. 3 (2016): 282–290.

Arifin, Samsul, dan Akhmad Zaini. “Dakwah Inklusif di Kalangan Bajingan: Membedah Komitmen Bekas Bajingan dalam Membangun Peradaban, Perspektif Psikologi Sosial.” Jurnal Dakwah 19, no. 1 (2018): 31–52.

Arifin, Zuhairansyah. “Pendidikan Moral Dalam Multi Perspektif.” Sosial Budaya 8, no. 1 (2011): 132–151.

Creswell, John W. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2007.

Hannan, Abd, dan Kudrat Abdillah. “HEGEMONI RELIGIO-KEKUASAAN DAN TRANSFORMASI SOSIAL Mobilisasi Jaringan Kekuasaan dan Keagamaan Kyai dalam Dinamika Sosio-Kultural Masyarakat.” Sosial Budaya 16, no. 1 (2019): 9–24.

Khatib, Ach. “Kontestasi Langgar dan Pesantren (Studi Atas Pranata Keagamaan Lokal di Sumenep Madura).” ’Anil Islam: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Ilmu Keislaman 9, no. 1 (2016): 32–54.

Khoiri, Ach. “Kontrol Politik Kyai dan Blater dalam Pelaksanaan Pemilu; Kajian Kelemahan Ketentuan Hukum Pemilu Menghadapi Rezim Kembar Politik di Madura.” VOICE JUSTISIA: Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan 1, no. 2 (2017): 131–141.

Kosim, Mohammad Kosim. “Kyai dan blater (elite lokal dalam masyarakat Madura).” KARSA: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture 12, no. 2 (2012): 149–160.

Muttaqin, Ahmad. “Agama dalam representasi ideologi media massa.” KOMUNIKA: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi 6, no. 2 (2012).

Nuruddiniyah, Siti. “Strategi politik Kyai dan Blater dalam pemilihan Kepala Desa di Desa Jangkar Kecamatan Tanah Merah Kabupaten Bangkalan.” PhD Thesis, IAIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 2010.

PRIBADI, YANWAR. “Jawara Banten dan Blater Madura: Studi Komparasi Hubungan Sosial-Keagamaan Mereka dengan Kiai.” Tazkiya 16, no. 02 (2017): 245–281.

Rozaki, Abdur. “Social origin dan Politik Kuasa Blater di Madura.” Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia 12 (2009).

Sahab, Ali. “Politik Patron-Client di Kabupaten Sampang.” Jurnal Adminstrasi Publik, 2012.

Sila, Muhammad Adlin. “Kiai dan Blater: Antara Kesalehan dan Kekerasan dalam Dinamika Politik Lokal di Madura.” Studia Islamika 26, no. 1 (10 April 2019). https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v26i1.11121.

Solihah, Rofiatus. “Kyai dan Blater Dalam Masyarakat Madura: Relasi Kekuatan Politik Lokal dalam Pilkades Desa Nagasareh Kecamatan Banyuates Sampang.” PhD Thesis, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 2015.

Susanto, Edi Susanto Edi. “Kepemimpinan [Kharismatik] Kyai Dalam Perspektif Masyarakat Madura.” KARSA: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture 11, no. 1 (2012): 30–40.

Syarif, Zainuddin. “Rekulturasi Pendidikan Islam di Tengah Budaya Carok di Madura.” KARSA: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture 22, no. 1 (2015): 114–136.

Umam, Shohebul. “Relasi Kuasa Dan Kesejahteraan Sosial.” UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2018.

Usman, Usman. “Blater, Pesantren Dan Pendidikan Formal.” Islamuna: Jurnal Studi Islam 4, no. 2 (2017): 262–275.

Wiyata, A. Latief. Carok; Konflik Kekerasan & Harga Diri Orang Madura. Lkis Pelangi Aksara, 2002.

Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2013.

Zamroni, Imam. “Dinamika Elit Lokal Madura.” MASYARAKAT: Jurnal Sosiologi, 2014, 23–48.

Zamroni, Imam Zamroni Imam. “Kekuasaan Juragan dan Kiai di Madura.” KARSA: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture 12, no. 2 (2012): 161–167.

Published
2020-07-02
How to Cite
Wati, A., Muadi, S., & Tawakkal, G. T. (2020). Hidup dalam Stigma: Kekerasan dan Religiuitas Bejingan. Al-Mada: Jurnal Agama, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 3(2), 109-202. https://doi.org/10.31538/almada.v3i2.694