The Effect of Contextual Teaching and Learning on Students’ English Grammar Competance
The research was aimed to the effectiveness of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) in teaching grammar. Experimental study of pretest-posttest was used in this research. Non-randomize sampling was used as sampling technique. The validity test was calculated using point biserial correlation, and reliability test was 0.848 which was calculated by using K-R 21 formula. In analyzing the data, researcher used ANCOVA. The result shows that average score of pretest was 60,95 for experimental group and 60,00 for control group. The average score of posttest was 85,95 for experimental group and 78,9 for control group. The calculation of ANCOVA found that the value of F is 8.7 and F critical with df 76 at 0.01 level of significance 6.96. it means that F value was higher the F critical. From the result of data analysis showed that Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) gave effect on teaching grammar for 7th grade students of junior high school.
Berns, R., & Erickson, P. (2001). Contextual teaching and learning: Preparing students for the new economy. The Highlight Zone Research, (5), 1–8.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching By Principles : An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (2nd ed.). London: longman.
Chen, P., & Schmidtke, C. (2017). Humanistic Elements in the Educational Practice at a United States Sub-Baccalaureate Technical College. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 4(2), 117–145. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.4.2.2
Elaine B, J. (2002). Contextual Teaching Learning. California: Corwin Press, Inc.
Faridi, A. (2010). The Development of Context-Based English Learning Resources for Elementary Schools in Central Java. Excellence in Higher Education, 1, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.5195/ehe.2010.13
Gudu, B. (2015). Teaching Speaking Skills in English Language Using Classroom Activities in Secondary School Level in Eldoret Municipality, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(35), 55–63. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1086371
Hakim, L. (2017). Analisis Perbedaan Antara Kurikulum KTSP dan Kurikulum 2013. Didaktika, 17(2), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.22373/jid.v16i1.590.5
Marcellino, M. (2008). ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN INDONESIA : A CONTINUOUS CHALLENGE IN EDUCATION AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY. Teflin, 19(1), 57–69.
Nurhadi, & Yasin, B. (2004). Pembelajaran kontekstual (contextual teaching and learning/CTL) dan penerapannya dalam KBK (Pertama). Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang (UM) Press.
Silviana, D., & Putri, A. (2013). THE USE OF JIGSAW II TECHNIQUE AND STILL PICTURES COMBINATION TO IMPROVE STUDENTS ’ VOCABULARY MASTERY. Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(2), 1–11. Retrieved from http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/elt
Yani, A. (2011). Teachers’ Incorrect Pronunciation and Its Impact on Young Learners: (A Review on Linguistic Aspects of EFL Classroom Practices). Teylin, (14), 179–189.
Copyright (c) 2019 ALSUNA: JOURNAL OF ARABIC AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.